Design Thinking · April 2026 · 4 min read
WindowsandDoors:uPVC,Aluminium,andWoodCompared
Windows and doors are structural, thermal, and acoustic decisions as much as aesthetic ones. In a coastal city like Visakhapatnam they are also a corrosion decision, which changes the answer more than most clients expect. Here is how the three materials we specify most often actually compare.
By Ankith, Partner · Creative Director & Architect

uPVC
The profiles are clean and contemporary, the seals are tight, and for the money nothing else matches its all-round thermal and acoustic behaviour. Multi-chambered profiles and well-made gaskets do genuine work in both dry heat and humidity, keeping interiors quieter and steadier than the frame's modest price would suggest.
Cost runs roughly Rs 450-Rs 900 per sq ft of window area, fully fitted, depending on the profile brand and glazing specified.
Maintenance is close to nothing. uPVC does not corrode, never needs painting, and shrugs off coastal salt air, which is a real advantage on our Vizag work. Occasional cleaning and a little hardware lubrication is the whole regime. UV-stabilised profiles hold their colour and structure well through intense coastal and plains sun, and a lifespan of 25 to 30 years is reasonable with almost no intervention.
We reach for it across nearly all residential work where a clean, modern profile suits the design language, and we recommend it specifically for coastal sites on the strength of its corrosion resistance alone.
Aluminium
Where the design wants minimal frame against maximum glass, aluminium is the answer. Slim sightlines and real structural strength make it the natural choice for large glazed openings, tall spans, and contemporary facades that would defeat a bulkier material.
Cost sits at roughly Rs 500-Rs 1,200 per sq ft and upward, with premium thermal-break systems at the higher end.
There is one caveat worth stating plainly. Standard aluminium conducts heat readily, so a thermal break, an insulating barrier set within the profile, is essential in a hot climate. It costs more and it performs meaningfully better, and it should be treated as the baseline specification rather than an upgrade. On the coast, a second caveat applies: standard anodised or powder-coated finishes will corrode in salt air over time. Marine-grade coating has to be specified explicitly for Vizag, never assumed. With it, expect 20 to 30 years, at the longer end in coastal conditions.
Best kept for large glazed facades, contemporary architectural language, and feature openings, always with a thermal break and, near the sea, a marine-grade coating.
Solid Wood (Teak and Similar Hardwoods)
Wood offers a warmth and material honesty the other two cannot reach, and it ages into character rather than degrading. It is also the most expensive option by a wide margin, at roughly Rs 1,200-Rs 2,500 per sq ft and upward for quality hardwood.
Thermally it insulates well by nature. Acoustic performance depends heavily on how it is built and sealed. Maintenance is the real commitment: refinishing every 3 to 5 years, and protection from sustained moisture. That last point matters in Vizag, where humidity and a monsoon-heavy climate make wood movement and fungal risk genuine concerns without proper treatment and careful species selection.
Given consistent upkeep, the lifespan is effectively multi-generational. Good teak doors routinely outlast the buildings around them. The condition is the upkeep, not the timber. We reserve it for statement entry doors, heritage-language projects, and clients for whom material authenticity outweighs maintenance convenience.
The Practical Recommendation
In Hyderabad's drier climate all three perform well, and the decision comes down largely to aesthetics and budget. For Vizag and other coastal work we default to uPVC or marine-grade thermal-break aluminium for windows, and reserve solid wood for statement entry doors alone. There its maintenance demands are worth the material's presence, and a single door can be protected far more easily than a full window system left exposed to salt air.
| Material | Cost, Rs per sq ft | Performance | Lifespan |
|---|---|---|---|
| uPVC | 450 to 900 | Excellent thermal and acoustic, resists salt air | 25 to 30 years |
| Aluminium | 500 to 1,200+ | Strongest for large spans, needs a thermal break | 20 to 30 years |
| Solid wood | 1,200 to 2,500+ | Warm, good insulation, high maintenance | Multi-generational with upkeep |
Takeaways
- uPVC gives the strongest thermal, acoustic, and corrosion performance for the price, and is our coastal default.
- Aluminium suits large glazed openings, but specify a thermal break as standard and marine-grade coating near the sea.
- Solid wood is the most expensive and the most demanding, best reserved for statement entry doors.
- Coastal salt air, not looks, drives most of the decision in Visakhapatnam.
- Indicative fitted costs: uPVC Rs 450-Rs 900, aluminium Rs 500-Rs 1,200+, hardwood Rs 1,200-Rs 2,500+ per sq ft.
Next in the journal
Kitchen Countertops: Granite, Quartz, Quartzite, and Marble Compared